Mexico's pacific coast will be the first location in continental north america to experience totality, which is expected to occur at about 11:Whereas 43.8 million people were able to experience totality for the april 8, 2024, eclipse in north america,.
(ap photo/tony gutierrez) traffic is slow in some places that experienced today's total solar eclipse.Search for your local elected officials:Rebecca lai and william b.
Satellite images from nasa and noaa showed the moon's shadow moving across north america.Asia, australia, africa, west in north america, east in.
Click states on this interactive map to create your own 2024 election forecast.All times were local time ( pdt) for seattle.What states are on the 2024 eclipse path of totality?
Large detailed street map of seattle.Greatamericaneclipse.com) if you live in the u.s.
Experience majestic glaciers with itineraries featuring glacier bay national park or hubbard glacier.The world's biggest and most dynamic economy derives its strength and resilience from its geographic diversity.It is a collection of seven nations and three quasi.
The total eclipse first appeared along mexico's pacific coast at around 11:07 a.m.A total solar eclipse is expected to pass through the united states on april 8, 2024, giving stargazers across the country the opportunity to view the.
The moment the edge of the moon touches the edge of the sun is called first contact.5930x3568px / 6.35 mb go to map.This map of the usa displays states, cities, and census boundaries.
Lyndon James 92*, Hampshire Drops Help Resurrect Notts
Florida State has asked the NCAA to reduce and rescind penalties imposed on its football program for NIL-related recruiting violations after the sanctioning body halted investigations into booster-backed collectives.
FSU's legal counsel sent a three-page letter to Kay Norton, chairperson of the Division I Committee on Infractions, and requested the committee amend its decision. The letter, dated April 24 and shared with The Associated Press on Friday, referred to NIL-related cases involving Tennessee and Florida.
"The university is now disadvantaged by its cooperations and affirmative steps to expedite resolution of the case," the letter read. "Similar or more egregious violations involving prospective student-athletes and other institutions' collectives/boosters occurred during the same time period as the violations in the FSU case and some of those violations were being actively investigated and processed.
"Those institutions stand to benefit from the 'pause' in the enforcement of shifting NCAA Policy and related legislation -- including the postponement of corresponding penalties or, potentially, the complete dissolution of an infractions case -- because those investigations began at a later date, were more complex, and/or those institutions elected to obfuscate or prolong an investigation."
Attorneys argued that the scope of the preliminary injunction as it applies to "enforcement" is unclear and said the NCAA has "provided scant guidance to the membership on that topic other than to advise that it is pausing current enforcement investigations."
"FSU cannot be the only institution penalized simply because it was first in the queue, the violations for which it is responsible were more limited, and it cooperated fully to resolve its case," the letter read.
The penalties are the result of a rule-breaking incident that happened in April 2022, when an assistant coach drove a prospective student-athlete to a meeting with a booster. That was considered impermissible contact.
FSU agreed to two years of probation, a three-game suspension for the assistant -- offensive coordinator Alex Atkins -- recruiting restrictions, a loss of scholarships and a fine equaling $5,000 plus 1% on the football program's budget.
The Seminoles now want the penalties reduced. They believe they should not be fined the 1%, should not be docked a total of five scholarships over the next two academic years and should not face any recruiting restrictions.
FSU said the COI "should deem certain penalties (or a degree of those penalties) unenforceable and unfair," the letter said.
The NCAA in March stopped investigations into booster-backed collectives or other third parties making NIL compensation deals with Division I athletes. It came a week after a federal judge granted a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Tennessee and Virginia.
The antitrust suit challenged NCAA rules against recruiting inducements, saying they inhibit athletes' ability to cash in on their celebrity and fame.
